|
BACTERIAL bIOREMEDIATION SYSTEMS
In some cases it's not practical to pass contaminated water
directly through a bacterial filtration system. Most often this is
due to the contamination event occurring either in a large body of
water or on land. In either case, a working solution to the problem
can involve culturing the appropriate bacteria that will feed upon
the contamination (food) source and releasing the 'bugs' into the
contaminated zone. While this sounds like a simple enough approach,
great care must be taken to insure the correct organisms are used
for the job at hand. Temperature, pH, salinity, oxygen levels (DO),
etc. all can have a dramatic impact on the success (or failure) of
this endeavor. Bioremediation/bioaugmentation is definitely not
a 'one size fits all' solution to a problem. Remember...universal
solutions universally work well on nothing!
BioFilter Systems can provide a wide range of equipment, custom
tailored to fit your unique situation. Please give us a call
so we can discuss your objectives and determine if we can be of
service.
Below is an
open letter regarding the ongoing situation in the Gulf of Mexico
June 17, 2010
Re:
Deepwater Horizon response
To All Spill Responders and
other interested parties:
With this letter, we
submit for your review our proposal for supplementing (not
necessarily supplanting) and supporting more traditional means
(booms and/or chemical detergent and dispersant agents) being used
in remediating oil contamination in coastal waters, including
estuarine grass and marsh lands, caused by the ever-encroaching
Deepwater Horizon drilling catastrophe. Biofilter Systems, LLC (the
“Company”), located in Gainesville, Florida, is a proven industry
leader in the fields of bioreactor and biofiltration system
technologies. (You may learn more about the Company’s products at
www.biolfilter.com). As a
consequence of its biofiltration capabilities and technologies, the
Company has acquired a unique understanding and valuable know-how in
cultivating various micro-flora on a larger scale, such as those
typically used in bioremediation of oil spills (i.e., pseudomonas,
flavobacterium, arthrobacter and azotobacter). The Company has
invaluable experience with the bioremediation of oil contaminants,
and has secured access to external resources that the Company
believes can provide additional expertise if needed.
We believe that
our proposed approach solves a myriad of problems that might
otherwise make bioremediation cost prohibitive or otherwise less
attractive given the current body of scientific literature. Our
solution involves bioremediation of oil contamination through the
use of so-called “petroleum-eating” bacteria, which we propose to
culture (e.g., produce) locally for faster and more effective
on-site or near-site deployment.
Needless to say, oil
spills can cause serious damage to marine wetland ecosystems. Oil
spills on coastal wetlands not only damage plants but also have
serious consequences for the wildlife and other organisms that rely
on the wetlands as habitats and nursery grounds. These impacts
include obvious immediate consequences, such as widespread animal
mortality due to smothering and toxic effects, which may persist
long-term.
Bioremediation
is an emerging technology that involves the addition of materials
(e.g. nutrients or other growth-limiting cosubstrates) to
contaminated environments to accelerate the natural biodegradation
processes (OAT, 1991). Scientists have recognized this technology
to be one of the least intrusive methods, and bioremediation has
been shown to be an effective tool for the treatment of oil spills
in medium and low-energy marine shorelines (Lee
et al,
1997; Swannell
et al.,
1996; Venosa
et al.,
1996, Zhu
et al.,
2001).
Bioremediation using bacterial/microbial means has proven to be an
accepted and effective remediation device when combating oil spills
on soil and in waterways, and can be used alone or in conjunction
with more traditional means (such as booms, dispersants, etc.). The
use of bacteria to remediate oil and fuel contaminated water and
soil is well documented (US Congress, 1991, EPA, 2001). In theory,
this type of bioremediation involves nothing more than connecting
natural predator (so-called petroleum-eating bacteria) with prey in
sufficient number to neutralize the deleterious effects of unleashed
petroleum. These bacteria work on both surface and subsurface
contaminants, and regardless of the form (e.g., tar balls,
“weathered oil,” surface slicks, etc.) affecting a particular area
(the efficacy on the different fractions of oil contamination of
which are summarized in the 2001 EPA reference). We believe that
our proposal works best in situations those situations involving
marine shorelines, coastal grasslands or wetlands and inlet
waterways—areas where access may be limited and environmental
conditions are most dynamic--and thus form our immediate focus.
A
variety of naturally occurring bacterial microbes do exist capable
of metabolizing hydrocarbons—some indigenous and some not. While it
might go without saying, to be effective the bacteria must therefore
necessarily be applied to the contaminated area while alive and
robust. Our proposal allows culturing and quicker deployment of
micro-flora indigenous to the site sought to be remediated,
necessarily making the applied micro-flora more robust.
The EPA found that success
of oil spill bioremediation depends on our ability to establish and
maintain conditions that favor enhanced oil biodegradation rates in
the contaminated environment. Environmental factors affecting oil
biodegradation include temperature, nutrients, oxygen, pH, and
salinity. Our proposal allows for
quicker production changes to account for the effects in such
variables (or changes to variables brought on by local conditions,
such as weather patterns) from locale to locale.
Perhaps our
proposal weighs in most heavily when one examines traditional costs
associated with bioremediation. Costs
associated with traditional deployments of bacteria in the
bioremediation of oil contamination can be prohibitive, and
logistics can be problematic especially if the areas targeted for
bioremediation are widespread, geographically dispersed or in area
difficult to access or environmentally sensitive (i.e., grasslands,
marshes or other wetlands). The bacteria must also be cultured and
shipped in water, in which it lives until it is applied. As a
consequence of the product’s specialty nature and limited market,
petroleum-eating bacteria (as most bacteria used in bioremediation
processes) have been traditionally cultured in centralized
production facilities, often located many miles away from the target
remediation site, and these production facilities are generally
limited in number and capacity. In addition, because of the limited
number of existing production facilities, deployment of the finished
batches of cultured bacteria (i.e., living colonies of bacteria
produced) usually involves transporting large volumes of fluid,
mainly of water, over long distances (typically by tank truck, tank
rail or perhaps by air) to the target remediation areas.
The
nature of the finished bacterial solution, namely being live natural
bacteria, requires transport under closed or sealed tanks that have
been previously sterilized in order to prevent contamination, and
requires constant refrigeration except perhaps in the coldest
environments. In addition, once transported to a holding area
pending final application, the finished solution must be stored
locally pending use, perhaps in other sterilized, climate-controlled
or refrigerated holding vessels. (Petroleum-eating bacteria
generally require storage at 50°F during long-distance shipping,
since they have an extremely short shelf-life.) Moreover, the
finished solution consists primarily of water (in terms of volume
and mass), which by way of contrast weighs approximately 8 lbs. per
gallon (versus the fractional weight of the active biological
ingredient). In other words, purchasers of the finished, cultured
bacteria bear an extraordinary expense of transporting cooled
water. Additionally, remediation areas may require several
treatments or applications of significant amounts of finished
product to be effective. Therefore, shipping, handling and storage
costs associated with large quantities of finished, bacterial
solutions produced at locations far away from the target remediation
sites, can be exorbitant.
The
Company’s innovation mitigates many of these inherent problems by
locally deploying one or more individual, modular
thermally-controlled fermentation units (which may also be deployed
as mobile production units) at or near the target remediation site,
and culturing or producing finished product in the quantities
needed, when needed. The system overcomes capacity issues by its
ability to deploy any number of individual fermentation units, the
ultimate number of which is limited only by physical space and
available water and power. These fermentation units use local water
resources, and only small batches of “starter” or highly
concentrated batches of bacteria or innocula, which is better
physically and economically suited for long-distance shipping and
special handling. These starter batches, being in concentrated
form, have a longer shelf-life (6 weeks or so under proper
refrigeration) than finished product, and can be more easily stored
locally. Our system then takes the innocula, and from it locally
cultures or produces exponentially larger batches or colonies for
use as finished product.
The
Company’s patent-pending system can be scaled, from one to any
number of fermentation or production units at a particular location
(suitable space being the only real restriction). A standard
fermentation unit can quickly produce 2,000+ gallons of finished
product, without suffering the time delay and expense involved in
constructing larger, more permanent tank farms, and the finished
contents deployed with minimal shipping, handling and storage.
These units can also be mounted on mobile platforms as well (trucks,
trailers, and barges, for example). Using more than one
fermentation tank in a mini-“tank” farm system also assures more
control of risks associated with human error and biological
contaminants, both of which pose grave threats to successfully
growing bacteria. The system can be tailored to work with the
growth conditions required of any particular family or consortia of
bacteria, and can be quickly modified on site if necessary. A fully
installed system (or some portion of its capacity) can also be
readily moved and redeployed elsewhere as and when needed. A
platform or some other fixed platform (which include solid ground
areas), electricity and a local water source serve as all of this
innovative system’s external needs.
The
Company has been in contact with numerous suppliers of bacteria that
have been used effectively around the world in remediating oil
spills. However, the Company also realizes that certain strains
have been used under certain conditions (e.g., cold water, open
water, freshwater, etc.), which may not indicate effectiveness in a
saline environment such as the warm Gulf or Florida’s local waters.
In other words, a significant number of variables do and will exist,
and may differ from locale to locale. Therefore, at this time, the
Company chooses to implement a local approach to better respond to
diverse factors, to work with one or more spill responders,
laboratories and governmental agencies in determining the strain or
consortia most promising given the local environmental conditions in
which the bioremediation measures are sought to be employed. The
Company does, however, have access to its own sources of innocula if
desired.
The Company’s
proposal allows for more rapid responses to the oil contamination
sites wherever they may emerge and to the dynamic nature of a
contamination crisis, both in terms of shifting locations and
changes in magnitude or conditions. It also permits for more rapid
modifications, if necessary, in cultivation materials and/or
procedures, to changes in factors such as pH, salinity, oxygen
rates, growing-media, etc., as well as generally allowing for much
quicker response times when operating in dynamic natural environs.
In sum, the Company’s proposed approach:
·
Substantially reduced costs in
conducting bioremediation activities.
·
Greatly increased efficiency and
effectiveness in conducting bioremediation activities.
·
Greater control over production
operations and more flexibility in responding to potential impacts
of local environmental factors.
·
Greater potential for timely treatment
of sensitive and restricted-access or remote areas.
·
Ability to deploy local resources in
cultivating or producing and applying finished product.
·
Ability to rapidly respond to the
contamination sites wherever they may emerge, and to the dynamic
nature of a contamination crisis, both in terms of shifting
locations and changes in magnitude or conditions.
·
Employment of a local workforce.
·
Overall, a much, much more efficient
expenditure of limited financial resources.
We
believe that our proposal presents a vastly more economical and
effective approach for producing and deploying whatever strain of
bacterium (or consortia thereof) that spill responders might choose
for a particular application.
This
proposal does not intend to be a white paper on petroleum-eating
bacteria or the environmental risks associated with using it. The
Exxon Valdez experience, along with the use of bio-remedial means in
several other oil calamities occurring in other parts of the world,
have been well documented and studied. On the Company’s website, we
have assembled some materials in a data room that you, or any other
spill responder, may access to learn more by way of background about
the biological materials previously discussed. If it is not up yet,
please check back for the link.
We look forward to
hearing from you, and assisting you in any way. The lines of
communication are always open, but please use email as the initial
means of contact until we have completed our pending relocation.
Until then, we thank you for your time.
Biofilter Systems, LLC
|